论断 (論斷)
lùn duàn
Pinyin

Definition

论断 (論斷)
 - 
lùn duàn
  1. to infer
  2. to judge
  3. inference
  4. judgment
  5. conclusion

Character Decomposition

Related Words (20)

bù duàn
  1. 1 unceasing
  2. 2 uninterrupted
  3. 3 continuous
  4. 4 constant
bù lùn
  1. 1 whatever
  2. 2 no matter what (who, how etc)
  3. 3 regardless of
  4. 4 not to discuss
duàn
  1. 1 to break
  2. 2 to snap
  3. 3 to cut off
  4. 4 to give up or abstain from sth
  5. 5 to judge
  6. 6 (usu. used in the negative) absolutely
  7. 7 definitely
  8. 8 decidedly
guǒ duàn
  1. 1 firm
  2. 2 decisive
wú lùn
  1. 1 no matter what or how
  2. 2 regardless of whether...

Idioms (20)

一刀两断
yī dāo liǎng duàn
  1. 1 lit. two segments with a single cut (idiom)
  2. 2 fig. to make a clean break (idiom)
一概而论
yī gài ér lùn
  1. 1 to lump different matters together (idiom)
伤筋断骨
shāng jīn duàn gǔ
  1. 1 to suffer serious injury (idiom)
割袍断义
gē páo duàn yì
  1. 1 to rip one's robe as a sign of repudiating a sworn brotherhood (idiom)
  2. 2 to break all friendly ties
卑之,毋甚高论
bēi zhī , wú shèn gāo lùn
  1. 1 my opinion, nothing very involved (idiom, humble expression); my humble point is a familiar opinion
  2. 2 what I say is really nothing out of the ordinary

Sample Sentences

很难说。关于这个话题,历史上无数的哲学家都试图证明过,却争论到现在都无法得到一个确切的答案。我又怎么能妄下论断呢。《三字经》里说:“人之初,性本善”,而西方哲学家则认为人性本恶,需要通过不断学习来改造自身。双方似乎都很有理。
hěn nánshuō 。guānyú zhège huàtí ,lìshǐ shàng wúshù de zhéxuéjiā dōu shìtú zhèngmíng guo ,què zhēnglùn dào xiànzài dōu wúfǎ dédào yī ge quèqiè de dá àn 。wǒ yòu zěnme néng wàngxiàlùnduàn ne 。《Sānzìjīng 》lǐ shuō :“rén zhī chū ,xìng běn shàn ”,ér xīfāng zhéxuéjiā zé rènwéi rénxìng běn è ,xūyào tōngguò bùduàn xuéxí lái gǎizào zìshēn 。shuāngfāng sìhū dōu hěn yǒulǐ 。
It's hard to say. Countless philosophers throughout history have tried to prove this. They've debated it to the point where it's impossible to get a clear answer today. How can I blindly make a judgment? It says in the ''Three Character Classic": People are born good. But Western philosophers think that people's nature is bad, and they need constant study to change themselves. It seems like both sides are reasonable. Frankly, the scariest thing in my opinion is talking about philosophical problems. This problem seems as hard to understand as why Oriental people like the color red, whereas Westerners like blue. It's really hard to come up with a straight answer.