Searching Conversation Posts

Joachim
February 28, 2008 at 05:37 AM posted in General Discussion

To my knowledge, searching at CPod only works for lessons, but not for conversation posts. If this is due to a lack of tagging, then why not enable tagging for users AND expand this user tagging to lessons, too. That's one part of Web 2.0 as fas as I understand.

Any other suggestions? 

Profile picture
Joachim
March 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM

mandomikey: AuntySue's suggestion goes in the right direction, but it still is quite cumbersome. Furthermore, the tagging issue is not solved this way - it's just an improved way to search the site.

Profile picture
mandomikey
February 29, 2008 at 12:48 AM

I asked this same question a few months ago...

http://chinesepod.com/connections/viewpost/mandomikey/connect/Searching+the+conversations....

Try following AuntySue's suggestion... not quite as convenient as having an improved search tool ingrained on the site, but it does the trick.

Profile picture
sparechange
February 28, 2008 at 10:43 PM

Me three. I've wanted to dig up old posts on several occasions. This would really be helpful.

Profile picture
Julesong
February 28, 2008 at 09:55 PM

Another suggestion - it would make lesson search easier if the results, in addition to:

Level - Lesson Title

Topic: Function:

Grammar: Popularity: | Ranking:

...also included the filename/numbering system. For instance:

Newbie - Friends for Dinner

ID: A0044

Topic: food Function: expressing_opinions

Grammar: Popularity: 645 | Ranking: 0.00

And if we could do a search via the ID #, that would be helpful, as well.

Profile picture
Julesong
February 28, 2008 at 09:46 PM

Ditto - it would be really useful!

Oh, and the capability to edit our posts, please.

Profile picture
Joachim
February 28, 2008 at 09:13 PM

I have just tried advanced search on google.com, but to no satifactory avail.

Profile picture
bazza
February 28, 2008 at 06:54 AM

I've tried a few times without much success. It must be possible somehow.

Profile picture
calkins
February 28, 2008 at 06:15 AM

I second that. I don't know how many times I've wanted to search for an old post.